Just stfu if you got nothing constructive to say. I post this for entertainment value as well as to warn potential idiots from getting scammed by her.... indeed underage.
1. Entertainment value?
Where?
2. Potential idiots?
Seems you are the one!
3. Indeed underage?
Good luck!
in her original ad she already showed her face pic anyway?
While I appreciate your effort to warn others but I think it would be better for you to remove the photos and especially the I/C.
Like what Sfan said what if the person in the photo and the I/C belongs to a totally different person? What if she finds out and report that they are being shared in this forum without her permission? This may put sbf into jeopardy seeing that AV is very on the ball nowadays and the other forum just got shut down.
Any lawyers care to comment? As FL is underaged, even the act of texting her for paid services is probably illegal. Would it be considered as grooming for paid sex ?
Anybody can clarify?
Got case precedent...... the underage FL case couple of years ago where many samsters up the lorry including peeps like DPP, SAF Colonel, School Principal, CEOs and scions of prominent family etc...
One of the Defendant did not PG and fought his case in court because he did not go through with the sex act after realising the girl could be underaged..... but the court still convicted him and sentenced him to 3 months jailtime because he had book an appointment with the FL and went to the hotel room. Even the FL statement to the court that she did not have sex with him could not save him.
. but the court still convicted him and sentenced him to 3 months jailtime because he had book an appointment with the FL and went to the hotel room. Even the FL statement to the court that she did not have sex with him could not save him.
One of the Defendant did not PG and fought his case in court because he did not go through with the sex act after realising the girl could be underaged..... but the court still convicted him and sentenced him to 3 months jailtime because he had book an appointment with the FL and went to the hotel room. Even the FL statement to the court that she did not have sex with him could not save him.
Hmm... I would like to know under what law this dude was prosecuted?
Because he didn't know that chicken was underage the time when he booked.
__________________
Whores are for fucking not loving. Just fuck them and be done with it.
Hmm... I would like to know under what law this dude was prosecuted?
Because he didn't know that chicken was underage the time when he booked.
With regards to the common protest: “I did not know she was below 16”, section 377D of the Penal Code clearly states that:
If the offender is above the age of 21, he cannot claim that he mistakenly believed the minor was not underage as a defence.
If the offender is below the age of 21, he may claim that he mistakenly believed the minor was not underage as a defence, but only if the minor was of the opposite sex, and if the offender has not previously committed any similar sexual offences before.
With regards to the common protest: “I did not know she was below 16”, section 377D of the Penal Code clearly states that:
If the offender is above the age of 21, he cannot claim that he mistakenly believed the minor was not underage as a defence.
If the offender is below the age of 21, he may claim that he mistakenly believed the minor was not underage as a defence, but only if the minor was of the opposite sex, and if the offender has not previously committed any similar sexual offences before.
I've just checked... you are absolutely right, bro.
By just texting the girl asking for sexual transaction is already a crime!
Quote:
Commercial sex with minor under 18
376B.—(2) Any person who communicates with another person for the
purpose of obtaining for consideration, the sexual services of a person
who is under 18 years of age, shall be punished with imprisonment for
a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.
[51/2007]
Mistake as to age
377D.—(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3) and notwithstanding
anything in section 79, a reasonable mistake as to the age of a person
shall not be a defence to any charge of an offence under
section 376A(2), 376B or 376C.
LOL hope TS realise what shit he has got himself into by contacting that gal and by whining on this thread
Hope AV realised this forum is NOT promoting illegal sex.