Filtered pics - where is the limit?

[blu3clues]

Noticed that FL pics usually quite filtered. Sometimes book a girl which looks completely different from her pics.

Then if want to reject, need to pay rejection fee?

How much filtering is too much and unreasonable??

[dqblue]

not just the pics are filtered, even genuine FR is being filtered to those that only say good things about girls even with bad services. Can understand that it is the girls that pay to post their profile as advertisement that those FL Sites tho... well, so I guess the site owner must filter lor

[blu3clues]

Originally Posted by dqblue

not just the pics are filtered, even genuine FR is being filtered to those that only say good things about girls even with bad services. Can understand that it is the girls that pay to post their profile as advertisement that those FL Sites tho... well, so I guess the site owner must filter lor

off topic but doesnt make sense

just becos FLs pay to advertise doesnt mean negative FRs should be removed. Got other sex boards around the world with same business model but very different business ethics

guess kumlan samsters only have themselves to blame for allowing themselves to be treated like fools

[babyjohnwong]

No lah, I don't think FLs pay to advertise
These FLs work under stables and OKTs do that
Being "customers" to such forums, in order to please them, I believe the site owners will have to remove the negative FRs as instructed
How does it work, may have to ask either the site owners or the OKTs to come clean
Is it a standard service? Is it by tier or by package, such as how many negative FRs will fall under which band and the OKTs pay according to the bands?

Now not so bad already lah, but photoshop still do wonders
Last time, a few years to several years back lagi worse
You google the image, come out is some overseas but maybe not so well known celebrity or model etc
OKTs are getting smarter and are catching with the technology that we are so familiar with now

[babyjohnwong]

Originally Posted by blu3clues

...

guess kumlan samsters only have themselves to blame for allowing themselves to be treated like fools

Can't really blame fellow samsters which you are one too
How many sex forums are there for the local market that has a viable pool of regular users and sex providers?
It is not like we do have much of a choice here
It is more like either we use this forum or we don't use local sex forums at all right?
If we do, we may just have to put up with these nonsense
I would love to see you setting up an alternative sex forum that is plain and honest with nothing to hide for all local users here hahaha

[blu3clues]

Originally Posted by babyjohnwong

No lah, I don't think FLs pay to advertise
These FLs work under stables and OKTs do that
Being "customers" to such forums, in order to please them, I believe the site owners will have to remove the negative FRs as instructed
How does it work, may have to ask either the site owners or the OKTs to come clean
Is it a standard service? Is it by tier or by package, such as how many negative FRs will fall under which band and the OKTs pay according to the bands?

Now not so bad already lah, but photoshop still do wonders
Last time, a few years to several years back lagi worse
You google the image, come out is some overseas but maybe not so well known celebrity or model etc
OKTs are getting smarter and are catching with the technology that we are so familiar with now

if SBF dont protect Okts from bad feedback, where else can they go with similar clout as SBF?

Who has the upper hand here?

[testoste]

Originally Posted by blu3clues

off topic but doesnt make sense

just becos FLs pay to advertise doesnt mean negative FRs should be removed. Got other sex boards around the world with same business model but very different business ethics

guess kumlan samsters only have themselves to blame for allowing themselves to be treated like fools

World is never fair. We just have to learn from exp to be more discerning. If site is good, then trust more. If site not good, be more careful - scrutinize more.

[babyjohnwong]

Originally Posted by blu3clues

if SBF dont protect Okts from bad feedback, where else can they go with similar clout as SBF?

Who has the upper hand here?

They can also pay SBF an attractive premium to eliminate what they don't like to see here
If one by one the OKTs start doing it, it becomes a norm and SBF gets even higher revenue, wouldn't that become an added bonus?
Many a times, money does work wonders...

[Penguin23]

As a client, I will always respect the rules as set out in the advertisement. OKTs sometimes share reviews of clients' behaviour amongst the girls, so unless you have several wechat/whatsapp numbers to front multiple identities, expect limited service once you badmouth a particular stable.

If I see a girl and I don't like her, I will let her know why but pay the rejection fee anyway. Their time is literally money, a rejection fee earns less than a job well done and only desperate WLs on their very last stretch of a stay will want to make (rejection) money by pissing off clients. Earning rejection money is simply not good business strategy.

Spend some time reading reviews of the ladies that you want to visit - sometimes you can see that a particular lady has been around for some time and hardly has any reviews (because most are bad and gets deleted by the advertiser), that is in itself a giveaway.

For the OKTs, if they are Advertisers (you can see an A) next to their Username - then they can modify and delete any posts within their thread. That is, to me totally reasonable.

There is nothing stopping you from posting an honest review in another thread within the same Dome if you have a bad encounter. Sometimes your posts get deleted, sometimes they don't. Always remember that this site is first and foremost a business. If you are a free Samster account, you are tolerated. If you want more service and maybe some answers to your questions, then pay more by getting a Premium Account or a Donor account. As a Donor, some of my posts get deleted too but I do get some answers (esp when I ask nicely) so I know where the OB markers are.

What you should not expect, is for SBF to treat a new free Samster account as a valuable customer. That is simply unrealistic.

[bageledhoney]

Originally Posted by Penguin23

As a client, I will always respect the rules as set out in the advertisement. OKTs sometimes share reviews of clients' behaviour amongst the girls, so unless you have several wechat/whatsapp numbers to front multiple identities, expect limited service once you badmouth a particular stable.

If I see a girl and I don't like her, I will let her know why but pay the rejection fee anyway. Their time is literally money, a rejection fee earns less than a job well done and only desperate WLs on their very last stretch of a stay will want to make (rejection) money by pissing off clients. Earning rejection money is simply not good business strategy.

Spend some time reading reviews of the ladies that you want to visit - sometimes you can see that a particular lady has been around for some time and hardly has any reviews (because most are bad and gets deleted by the advertiser), that is in itself a giveaway.

For the OKTs, if they are Advertisers (you can see an A) next to their Username - then they can modify and delete any posts within their thread. That is, to me totally reasonable.

There is nothing stopping you from posting an honest review in another thread within the same Dome if you have a bad encounter. Sometimes your posts get deleted, sometimes they don't. Always remember that this site is first and foremost a business. If you are a free Samster account, you are tolerated. If you want more service and maybe some answers to your questions, then pay more by getting a Premium Account or a Donor account. As a Donor, some of my posts get deleted too but I do get some answers (esp when I ask nicely) so I know where the OB markers are.

What you should not expect, is for SBF to treat a new free Samster account as a valuable customer. That is simply unrealistic.

So why dont SBF function as a closed platform only open to subscribers/donators??

[Maxes]

In this day and age, which industry has no filtered pics, hotel show nice rooms, tourist spot show nice scene, restaurant show great looking food, hawker center hawkers also the same.

Then you see a small small disclaimer : Photos are for illustration purposes only.

Always have to do research to get a clearer picture.

[sammyboyfor]

Originally Posted by blu3clues

Noticed that FL pics usually quite filtered. Sometimes book a girl which looks completely different from her pics.

Then if want to reject, need to pay rejection fee?

How much filtering is too much and unreasonable??

No amount of filtering should be acceptable.

However even light filtering is always obvious. If you cannot imagine any human with skin that smooth, eyes that big and chin that sharp then you know it's filtered.

[iwanbj]

Skip any FL who asks for rejection fee-- it's always a scam, and they are so fugly they are really unfuckable unless you turn off the lights. Most ladies use Beauty app and similar filters which can make a real live elephant look like a sexy syt. So many fake FRs even for the baby elephants.

[AhMin]

Originally Posted by iwanbj

Skip any FL who asks for rejection fee-- it's always a scam, and they are so fugly they are really unfuckable unless you turn off the lights. Most ladies use Beauty app and similar filters which can make a real live elephant look like a sexy syt. So many fake FRs even for the baby elephants.

Agree - Upz 4 Xchange - AhMin

[Fat Fatt]

Originally Posted by iwanbj

Skip any FL who asks for rejection fee-- it's always a scam, and they are so fugly they are really unfuckable unless you turn off the lights. Most ladies use Beauty app and similar filters which can make a real live elephant look like a sexy syt. So many fake FRs even for the baby elephants.

Go GL and what you see is what you get.